6.08.2009

Thomas Paine and Rebellion


Human rights originate in Nature, thus, rights cannot be granted via political charter, because that implies that rights are legally revocable, hence, would be privileges:

It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect — that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few . . . They . . . consequently are instruments of injustice.

The fact, therefore, must be that the individuals, themselves, each, in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.

Government's sole purpose is safeguarding the individual and his/her inherent, inalienable rights; each societal institution that does not benefit the nation is illegitimate — especially the Monarchy, the Nobility, and the Military.

Thomas Paine was an English-American pamphleteer (agitator), revolutionary, radical, inventor, intellectual, and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States.

He lived and worked in Britain until age 37, when he emigrated to the British American colonies, in time to participate in the American Revolution. His principal contributions were the powerful, widely-read pamphlet Common Sense (1776), advocating colonial America's independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain, and The American Crisis (1776–1783), a pro-revolutionary pamphlet series.

If Paine were alive today and lived in Venezuela he would be blogging (agitating, pamphleteer) against Chavez and calling people to rise in arms.

6.07.2009

Franklin on Chavez



Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Benjamin Franklin

Franklin sought to cultivate his character by a plan of thirteen virtues, which he developed at age 20 (in 1726) and continued to practice in some form for the rest of his life. His autobiography lists his thirteen virtues as:
"TEMPERANCE. Eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation."
"SILENCE. Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation."
"ORDER. Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have its time."
"RESOLUTION. Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve."
"FRUGALITY. Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself; i.e., waste nothing."
"INDUSTRY. Lose no time; be always employ'd in something useful; cut off all unnecessary actions."
"SINCERITY. Use no hurtful deceit; think innocently and justly, and, if you speak, speak accordingly."
"JUSTICE. Wrong none by doing injuries, or omitting the benefits that are your duty."
"MODERATION. Avoid extremes; forbear resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve."
"CLEANLINESS. Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, cloaths, or habitation."
"TRANQUILLITY. Be not disturbed at trifles, or at accidents common or unavoidable."
"CHASTITY. Rarely use venery but for health or offspring, never to dullness, weakness, or the injury of your own or another's peace or reputation."
"HUMILITY. Imitate Jesus and Socrates."

6.05.2009

Corapi on perils of US socialism


I read this article written by Father John Corapi, reflecting on the perils of socialism in government. I think its groundbreaking for a priest to address issues, such as governance and politics.

"Flash point: The point at which something is ready to blow up. That has been my perception of Western society in general for some time now. Perhaps, a train wreck waiting to happen would be another way to put it. All evil can claim its ultimate origin in moral evil. Those that deny objective standards of morality merely facilitate the demise of their society. When it happens they will be nowhere to be found.

That apparently large numbers of people seem to be intellectually and morally numb is not news, but the near light-speed evaporation of our way of life is. Actions have consequences, and sometimes the consequences can’t be seen this side of eternity. That does not mean they aren’t real. You will be seeing some of the consequences very soon, however, not the worst, but the most immediate.

Personal liberty has already begun to be compromised. Various governments, including the United States, now own car companies like General Motors and Chrysler, mega insurance companies, soon perhaps health care and energy. Injustice is beginning to be seen from the smallest of individuals to the largest of corporations. The only problem with that is that governments have never been able to operate anything profitably, efficiently, or equitably. The little guy and the large corporation will all be equal opportunity recipients of heavy-handed injustice very soon.

The government is about to dictate what car you can drive, how you insure it, what your bank can pay you or not, what kind of heating you have in your home, if you can have air conditioning or not. And, oh, if you eat a Twinkie your health insurance premium is going up. If you get sick, perhaps the Twinkie did it, and you aren’t covered.

You might say that the government needs to control things to keep us safe, etc. That might work if the people in government could be trusted. They can’t, but we elected them. We get what we deserve, and many chickens are about to come home to roost.
One of the inherent difficulties with a democratic republic is that it is only as good as the people in it. When a people lose their moral equilibrium, live in sin, and suffer the consequent loss of wisdom, then that nation’s days are numbered.

Why? How have we come to this? It can be traced to the most compelling moral issue of our times, and we can’t escape from it, no matter how uncomfortable it is—abortion and other life issues. No matter what other rosy picture is painted by those that would have you believe all is well, God is not a disinterested spectator. Regardless of the high sounding rhetoric of the day, seeming progress in this or that area, it is an illusion. Nothing will ultimately go well for the United States or any other country until the injustice of all injustices is remedied. Until every human being is respected and reverenced, from the moment of conception to the last moment of natural life, no one will be safe and secure. Whether it is the helpless infant in the womb or the misguided and/or evil abortionist on the wrong end of a bullet, all deserve the safety and security of the law. Only God can in justice and wisdom decide when life begins and when life ends. When we attempt to usurp God’s job description we always come up short.


God Bless You,

Fr. John Corapi"

6.04.2009

David Carradine RIP



Kung Fu and Kill Bill star David Carradine was found yesterday dead in a hotel room in Bangkok, Thailand. Apparently he was found in his robe...

Carradine was an excelent actor, reminding the mythical Kung Fu star who roamed the earth and mostly recently Bill in Kill Bill series delivered by Quentin Tarantino...

A sad loss for movies.

6.03.2009

Cuban Style in Venezuela-Venezuelan journalist predicts Chavez next moves



Venezuelan journalist Nitu Perez Osuna has recently predicted what is to come for Chavez. I totally agree with Mrs Perez Osuna, I think it will be the natural effect of all Chavez's regulation. Now with an increase of upwards of 30,000 state workers (oil industry, cements, banking, and iron/steel workers it is expected to have at least a tough time to come up with workers wages. The economic strain will be felt and the private medical industry, consequently, expropriated and nationalized. Also the expropriation of private television and radio networks.

This is a free translation of Perez-Osuna note:

The gratuity of the now private health service will be issued on decree, all medical and auxiliary personnel will be added on the employees list of the state. Their installations will be expropriated by paying their owners 5% of market value in state bonds.

The use of cable and other satellite communications will be restricted to official departments and to hotels and tourist establishments. The use of mobile telecommunications will be solely for State representatives.

Internet access will be eliminated for natural persons. All private radio and television stations will be expropriated and will contribute for a sole national state network.

6.01.2009

The dissapareance of Hugo Chavez




Last week celebrating the 10th anniversary of his Television show, Alo Presidente (Hello President), Hugo Chavez announced the transmission of the presidential show for 4 consecutive days (with its respective pauses). Now, he started the television show on Thrusday from my hometown of Zulia, and Friday in Caracas, when he dissapeared from public view. The television show was cancelled on Saturday and that very day public sources announced that it will back on Sunday from central Venezuela with Bolivian President Evo Morales. Suprisingly (or not) Chavez was no where to be found...

Presidential sources confirmed that the television show, Alo President was also cancelled on Sunday citing "technical problems". The public channels are broadcasting general news on Venezuela and remain suspisiciously silent as to where is Hugo Chavez and the real reason behind his dissapareance.

5.28.2009

Chavez announces internet cutback



Even though President Hugo Chavez initially supported internet, with the enactment of a Presidential Decree in the year 2000 whereby internet was declared a national priority, today he has grown scare of its effects. Now Chavez has recently announced that the internet is a "luxury and must be eliminated from public spenditure". This is just an effort to curtail freedom of expression.

Now, this is just the beginning of the regulation of the internet. The obvious first step is to eliminate public offices and officials from accessing the net, then it will obvious that the regulation must reach private individuals, which mostly feed the internet with not so-Chavez friendly messages. Or better off, without the Chavez government directly or indirectly regulating the content of the internet on Venezuela. This is just a product of Chavez´s frustration with his lack of jurisdiction to regulate the content on internet.

In my opinion, this will slowly transform into the regulation of internet for private individuals (and maybe to yours truly, this humble blogger). Maybe Chavez will outright ban the access to internet to everyone, or either regulate the connection frequency times or perhaps issue a government clearence to whom could access the net.

The days of internet accesss in Venezuela are counted...

5.27.2009

First Hispanic in the US Supreme Court



Obama has recently nominated Sonia Sotomayor for the United States Supreme Court, if approved by United States Congress, she will be the first Hispanic ever in the United States Supreme Court.

Sonia Sotomayor (born June 25, 1954) is a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On May 26, 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Judge Sotomayor for appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice David Souter.[2][3] Sotomayor is of Puerto Rican descent, and was born in the Bronx. Her father died when she was nine, and she was raised by her mother. Sotomayor graduated with a B.A., Summa Cum Laude, from Princeton in 1976, and received her J.D. from Yale Law School in 1979, where she was an editor at the Yale Law Journal. She worked as an Assistant District Attorney in New York for a time before entering private practice in 1984. Considered a political centrist, Sotomayor was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by President George H. W. Bush in 1991 and confirmed in 1992.

Sotomayor has ruled on several high profile cases. In 1995, she issued the preliminary injunction against Major League Baseball which ended the 1994 Baseball Strike. Sotomayor made a ruling allowing the Wall Street Journal to publish Vince Foster's suicide note. In 1997, she was nominated by Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. After more than a year, she was confirmed and joined the court in 1998. Sotomayor was an Adjunct Professor at New York University School of Law from 1998 to 2007 and has been a lecturer-in-law at Columbia Law School since 1999.

5.26.2009

CD Review - the Crystal Method - Divided by Night




Just in time for summer, the Crystal Method launched a new CD this past May 12th, 2009, the title Divided by Night...

This is one of my favorite electronic acts, even though the mainly play nowadays, dj live sets, still one of the truest and most innovative sounds in the electronic movement.

The first single, Drown in the Now, features Matisyahu on vocals. This track absolutely rocks, its sort of mantric with deep bass sounds and also recommend Come back clean, a great deep song.

In an interview with The Boston Herald, Scott Kirkland of the Crystal Method said:

“The album is different. There are big, organic live drums and distortion and lots of bass and that sort of bombastic sound that we’ve been doing for so many years. But lots of collaborations have taken it in lots of different directions. I think people are going to be happy with it."

5.21.2009

by the Power of the 3 wolves shirt



Funny things on the internet

A T-shirt has become one of the most popular items sold by online retailer Amazon in the past few weeks.

Sales of the kitsch Three Wolf Moon T-shirt shot up 2,300% after a spate of ironic reviews went viral.

The first review gave the shirt five stars, saying it "Fits my girthy frame, has wolves on it, attracts women" but "cannot see wolves with arms crossed".

That prompted hundreds of others to post frivolous reviews, turning the page into an internet phenomenon.

"When I put this T-shirt on for the first time, my wife left me! Thank you, Three Wolf Moon T-Shirt," wrote one wag, while another said that "the Three Wolf Moon T-Shirt gave me a +10 resistance to energy attacks, +8 Strength... and I have successfully solved 7 crimes in my city".

Amazon's senior manager of community content, Russell Dicker, said the T-shirt was currently the top selling item in their clothing store.

"The Three Wolf Moon T-Shirt recently moved up 2,300% in sales rank," he said. "We are grateful that our reviewers are so passionate."

However, the firm which actually makes the T-shirt appeared less than pleased at some of the comments.

"The Mountain is a wholesale company and does not sell shirts on Amazon, so this viral assault went under our radar until the shirt made it into the top 10 in the Amazon apparel section," they said in a posting on the Amazon site.

"We appreciate humour as much as the next company, but we don't approve of some of the remarks.

"Not everyone can start out at the top and not everyone from our neck of the woods lives in a trailer or cruises Walmart to hook up."

This is not the first time comedy reviews on Amazon have gone viral. In 2006, there were more than a thousand reviews for Tuscan Whole Milk.

They ranged from soap opera-style script - "That was when I knew. He was tired of this life with me, tired of bringing home the Tuscan Whole Milk, 1 Gallon, 128 fl oz" - to stating the obvious: "Has anyone else tried pouring this stuff over dry cereal? A-W-E-S-O-M-E!"

Masochistic Baby





by Shel Silverstein

Oh, ever since my Masochistic Baby went and left me
I got nothin' to hit but the wall.
She loved me when I beat her,
But I started actin' sweeter,
And that was no way to treat her at all.
Yes, she is the one that I'm dreamin' of,
And you always hurt the one you love.
And ever since my Masochistic Baby went and left me,
I got nothin' to hit but the wall, oh no...
Nothin' to beat but the eggs
Nothin' to belt but my pants
Nothin' to whip but the cream
Nothin' to punch but the clock
Nothin' to strike but a match

5.18.2009

Mario Benedetti RIP



Yesterday, poet Mario Benedetti passed away. Lets remember him with some of his quotes. Born in Uruguay, Benedetti was, in deed, one of the best living Latin American poets...

“No vayas a creer lo que te cuentan del mundo (ni siquiera esto que te estoy contando) ya te dije que el mundo es incontable.”

"Do not go on believing what they tell you of the world (not even this that I am telling you) I told you the world is untellable."

“Yo no sé si Dios existe, pero si existe, sé que no le va a molestar mi duda.”

"I do not know if God exists, but if he does, I know he will not be mad at my doubt."

“Un torturador no se redime suicidándose, pero algo es algo.”

"A torturer does not redeem himself after commiting suicide, but something is something"

“Acá hay tres clases de gente: la que se mata trabajando, las que deberían trabajar y las que tendrían que matarse.”

"There are three kinds of people, those who die working, those who should be working, and those who deserve to be dead."

5.17.2009

Los Maracuchos


Life in Venezuela’s Oil Boomtown

By Brian A. Nelson

Published: Summer 2008 in The Southern Humanities Review

The travel books, if they mention it at all, will tell you to stay away from Maracaibo. Venezuela’s second largest city is “dangerous,” “crime-ridden,” and “lawless.” It has also been described as “an environmental disaster area,” “disease-infested” and, of course, “infernally hot.” This is a town with a Surgeon General’s warning. One of the more optimistic reviews put it this way: “Maracaibo has absolutely no must-see attractions.” (1)

“Lawless” is certainly fair. This is the wild west; where everyone carries a pistol and where carjacking is such a formal industry that local merchants sell vacunas or “vaccinations”—for a thirty-dollar window sticker (the money somehow makes its way back to the mob) the carjackers will, like the angel of death at a blood-soaked doorway, pass you and your car over…for a month.

You can do whatever you want in Maracaibo, no one will stop you. Sell pirated DVDs from your front porch, drive as soon as your feet reach the pedals, throw McDonalds bags out your car window at high speeds, cut into queues (honestly, there really aren’t any queues, just mobs; only fools and foreigners wait their turn) and in Maracaibo, as a general rule, if it isn’t bolted down, it’s yours.

I landed here for the first time, mullet-haired and pimple-faced, in 1988 as a high school exchange student. It was all a big mistake really. I was too naïve/trusting/stupid to specify a country of preference on my application and instead wrote, “Spanish-speaking.” What a relief I must have been for the main office—“Ha! Finally, a kid we can send to Maracaibo.”

I soon learned that Maracaibo, with its 2.1 million residents, was home to Venezuela’s infamous redneck population. I had landed in Hazard County, Venezuela. Maracuchos, as they are known, have a reputation for being so ill-mannered, so vulgar and rude, that all over Venezuela they are summarily turned away from hotels and restaurants simply because of their zip code. They all cuss (and I mean all of them—toddlers to grandmas) like sailors, and in a marvel of modern linguistics have managed to make the word “cock” (verga) fit every part of speech, far eclipsing the ubiquity of “fuck” in English. Let’s take a look. In a greeting: “How’s the verga?” As an adverb of quantity: “That rally contained a verguero of people!” (a lot or a “cock-load”). As a noun in an (un)conditional: Q: “Are you going to the ballet?” A: “Not even with the verga!” (no way). As an indefinite noun: “Could you pass me that verga?” As an interjection: “Vergación!” (Wow!). Etcetera.

I say that Maracuchos cuss like sailors not because it is an easy cliché, but because it is literally true. Dating back to Spanish colonialism, Maracaibo, which sits on the Caribbean near the eastern border of Colombia, has always been a port city and, thus, has absorbed races and cultures from all over the world. Nowhere is this sailors’ legacy (and the sailors’ disdain for convention and etiquette) more apparent than in the naming of children. Venezuelan parents are already famous for bestowing bizarre names on defenseless offspring, often of historic figures (Mao, Nixon, Elvis), but in Maracaibo anything goes. Creating acronyms from the parents’ names is common (Yoma, for example, was begat by Yolanda Ortiz and Marco Alvarez); some names, while good, are too ordinary for Maracuchos so they reverse the spelling, as in the case of my host-sister-in-law whose name is Legna, Angel spelled backward (this one actually “back”fired since her friends, to this day, tease her that she is the anti-Christ); Greco-roman figures are favorites, too (Socrates and Plato), and in a salute to all things maritime, the names of ships are always popular; hence, Usnavy is now a common name for little girls (makes you wonder where daddy was from, doesn’t it?).

Hot, Hotter and Vergación!”
Did I mention it’s hot here? Sitting right at sea-level next to South America’s biggest lake (the aforementioned environmental disaster), Maracaibo is one of the most uncomfortable places on earth. Citing the average temperature (in the 90s) doesn’t quite do it justice since it is the humidity that makes it so unbearable. How humid? It’s that perpetually sweating, never completely dry, fungus-sprouting-in-every-adjoining-body-part humid. Drying yourself after a shower is an exercise in futility because you are eventually just wiping away sweat. I survived only through the grace of air conditioning and by coating half my body in talcum powder.

The combination of heat, humidity, and poor sanitation make Maracaibo the perfect incubator for tropical diseases, a paradise for germs. I know this not because the travel books warned me (they didn’t) but because many, if not all, of these diseases have been kind enough to take up residence in my overly pampered first-world body.

In a six-week period in 2003 I was host to the following Maracucho maladies: a pectoral fungus (how careless of me not to put talcum powder there), scabies (that wonderful ailment that necessitates burning half your wardrobe and boiling your underwear), a prostate infection (I’ll spare you further details), and intestinal amoebas (between trips to the bathroom I would devour obscene quantities of refined sugar—chocolate, bonbons, coke, anything—because, as you may know, one’s diet gets a bit quirky when you are eating for a million).

But c’est la vie; I’m sure I am better for it. Not only has my Spanish vocabulary improved enormously (phrases like, “I need a Petri dish for my fecal sample,” are now second nature), but if it is really true that whatever doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger, then I must have a preternaturally primed immune system. In fact, I fancy that when the next big one hits—whether it is a killer comet like in Armageddon, or an eco-apocalypse like The Day After Tomorrow, or a new (Monsanto-made) disease á la 12 Monkeys—it won’t be Ben Affleck and Brad Pitt and Dennis Quaid who survive. No, it will be the cockroaches and the Maracuchos (and yours truly). We will be the ones (you’ll know my offspring by the blond hair) who will carry on the human experiment after you and your wussy, need-a-flu-shot-every-six-months immune system are gone.

South America’s Beverly Hillbillies
Now I have to tell you about one of history’s great moments and the culminating moment in Maracaibo’s past. Even a hundred years ago Maracuchos already had their infamous reputation, and other Venezuelans—particularly the more aristocratic Caraqueños (residents of the capital Caracas)—already looked down their noses at the backward Maracuchos in their forgotten, mosquito-infested little town. Then on the seemingly ordinary morning of December 14, 1922 something very extraordinary happened. From across Lake Maracaibo there came a deafening howl from deep within the earth, “a roar that froze the blood,” and Barrosa oil well Number Two erupted as if the very skin of the earth had been punctured.(2) It blew for ten days straight, spewing over 840,000 barrels of oil 200 feet into the air and inundating the surrounding jungle. The villagers were up to their knees in the stuff, and The New York Times declared it “the most productive [well] in the world." (3) Literally overnight, Maracaibo became an oil boomtown with twice as many brothels as churches (which probably wasn’t much of an increase, really) and Venezuela became a major player in the global energy game. Today it ranks sixth in the world in proven reserves, higher than any country outside the Middle East.(4)

Suddenly Maracuchos were Venezuela’s Beverly Hillbillies. The place was flooded with businessmen and oil workers from around the world and Maracuchos—who had basically been living in 18th century conditions thanks to caudillo warfare and disease—found themselves in a bustling 20th century city. Yet even after the discovery of oil, Maracaibo remained oddly isolated. There were still no roads connecting Maracaibo to Caracas—or any other city for that matter—and for a long time, the trip to Caracas required a visa, since the three day boat ride made a stop at the Dutch island of Curacao.(5) So Maracaibo, with its back to the Colombian jungle and its face to the lake, continued to grow as it had in colonial days: through its port. It was not until the 1960s that the largest concrete bridge in the world was built connecting Maracaibo with the rest of the country. But by then it was too late. Maracuchos were a breed apart, and—they were quick to add—a better breed. They had their own music, Gaita; their own Creole cooking; their own sport, baseball, which is now the national sport thanks to North American oilmen; and of course their expletive-filled vernacular that used the antiquated vosotros tense and dropped the 'd' on all past participles.
But it was not just oil that fueled the Maracuchos’ faith in their superiority. Zulia (the state in which Maracaibo resides) also turned out to be the nation’s breadbasket. Today, between hydrocarbons and agriculture, the state produces over sixty percent of the country’s GDP, yet its population is only 13 percent of Venezuela’s total of 25 million.(6) If it is hard get your mind around it, imagine if the U.S.’s only export was oil and that one state (say Texas) produced two-thirds of it AND that same state generated most of the sugar, poultry, beef, and milk that the country consumed, AND that this state had evolved in cultural isolation from the other lower 47 until the 1960s. (7) Now shrink that mighty mighty Texas to one fifteenth its size and that, that ultra-concentrated little state would be Zulia, and their residents would be Zulianos and Maracuchos, Texans with ten times the ego and one tenth the subtlety. And you thought Dallas was bad.

The only problem is that, unfortunately for the Maracuchos and Zulianos, little of this tremendous wealth is ever seen in their home state. Venezuela’s centralized economy means that all oil revenues go straight to Caracas and never come back. While corrupt politicians spend lavishly on wasteful projects and fill their foreign bank accounts, Zulia and Maracaibo are left neglected. One can easily imagine how the Maracuchos feel about this. Which brings us to another similarity they share with their North American simulacrum. Maracuchos would be perfectly happy seceding from the union, which, in fact, they have petitioned to do several times.

Driving
In 1989 it appeared in a local paper that Venezuela had the highest number of car accidents in the world, per capita. Surprise surprise, Maracaibo, where traffic lights are optional, has the most car accidents within Venezuela. Now, in Maracaibo there is a famous street, 72nd Street, notorious for being the most perilous street in town—this is where teenagers simultaneously cruise and drag race on weekend nights. Following this irrefutable deductive reasoning, 72nd Street was immediately (and quite proudly) christened the most dangerous street in the world, a fact that may very well be true. (Who said this place had no must-see attractions?) My friend Alvaro lives on 73rd Street and on weekend nights in high school we would sit on his patio and listen to the revving engines, window-vibrating bass, and the honking horns that came from the next block. Every now and then we would hear a sudden screeching of tires and would turn our heads in anticipation, waiting for the promised clap of metal on metal and the sudden wailing of a car alarm. We were rarely disappointed.

How bad is it? I was in three car accidents in my first 11 months in Maracaibo, (luckily none of them serious) and collisions are so common that insurance companies will not cover an accident that occurs in an intersection. (What the $#^%!) Words fail me.

It isn’t only how they drive, it’s what they drive: In the late ‘60s and early ‘70s it looked like Venezuela was about to break out, about to become a little Saudi Venezuela, a Qatar-like state awash in oil wealth, the kind of place where instead of paying taxes, the government rewarded you with money every year. The world oil “crisis” of 1973 marked a massive boom for the country. Drowning in oil revenues and cheap loans, Venezuelans started buying imported cars like Imelda Marcos bought shoes. And with Venezuelan gasoline costing only pennies a gallon, they bought the biggest cars they could find, with hoods like king-sized beds and trunks like Jacuzzis. Of course, the boom didn’t last. Venezuela finished the decade with the highest per capita debt in Latin America and stuck in the same debt trap that plagues so much of the developing world—exporting their natural resources to finance debt instead of funding social programs.

But the cars remained. And with the end of the oil boom those cars had to last. To this day, the most common cars in Maracaibo are Dodge Darts and Ford Mavericks. And other big dinosaurs— Chargers, 440 Road Runners, and Impalas—still roam the highways. Some are in pristine condition, most are held together with coat hangers and Bondo.

Love
I have discovered through my extensive ethnographic research that Maracuchos like to copulate with a certain leporine vigor. Yes, I must say, they probably like it more than you and I and, I hypothesize, even other Venezuelans. Unfortunately, most of this sex is not the steamy, Lambada-like concupiscence you’d expect. It is actually hard to imagine, literally… mechanically. It is toy poodle, Saint Bernard sex. The typical Maracucha (female) is Wile E. Coyote-drooling-over-the-roadrunner gorgeous. (Venezuela, you might know, has had more Ms. Universe winners than any other country—many of them from Maracaibo.) But the Maracuchos (males)…well, they are a different story. More often than not they are extremely fat, corpulent beings who have been overstuffed by their doting mommies with too much pabellón—the quintessential dish of shredded beef, rice, and fried plantain. In addition to this endomorph meets ectomorph mating convention, there is usually a big (and when I say big, I mean Nabakovian) age difference between papi and the mamacita.\

I present the following case study: Once, early on, I was invited to el Club Nautico, Maracaibo’s famous (and only) yacht club. Having spent most of my time with my middle and lower class friends and host family, I was anxious to get a good look at the uppers, los sifrinos as they are known, the snobs. Picture the scene: it is Friday night in the most exclusive nightclub in town. The place is full of beautiful nymphets, and hulking middle-aged men. My first thought was, ah, it must be “bring your daughter night,” wait, did you see the way that man just kissed his daughter? What can I say, I was naïve. I was also shocked, repulsed. Just watching the couples make out on the dance floor made me queasy. This can’t be love, I thought, it’s economic opportunism, a way for women to gain power in a macho society. But I came to understand that this phenomena did not occur just among the elites. Yes, while it is more socially acceptable to “marry up” in Venezuela, the accepted age standards have been dramatically widened among all classes. Men in their forties often marry girls in their teens—my friend Alvaro’s mom was married to his father (a doctor…a gynecologist in fact) when she was fourteen (she was also from a prominent family).
I suspect a big reason for this is Venezuela’s beauty queen culture. Femininity in Venezuela embraces, without question, the idea that a woman’s power comes from her beauty. And Venezuelan beauty means sexuality. I suppose that the stereotype of the hyper-sexual Latina was born here because in all of Latin America—and I can personally speak for Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Argentina—I have never seen anything like it. From the girls in their dental-floss bikinis to the semi-pornographic cerveza commercials, the objectification of women as sexual objects is everywhere, constantly reinforcing the cultural definition of beauty. Sound familiar?

Accordingly, there is a major emphasis on clothes, fashion and make-up. Then there is etiquette. I sometimes suspect that there is a secret school in the Andes that all Venezuelan girls attend because they have all mastered a very complicated system of feminine mannerisms and protocols. They know just how to be women—when to touch your arm during a casual conversation, how to double wrap your whiskey in napkins so it doesn’t chill your fingertips(!!!), and, at the appearance of a camera, how to instantly strike a pose. This secret training, I know, starts very young. Once I asked my host-niece if she wanted to go to the corner for an ice-cream. She threw up her hands in exasperation. “Por favor, tio Brian. You know that I can’t go out looking like this. Just look at my hair. You have to give me at least a half an hour to get ready.” She is five.

Maracaibo and the Rest of Venezuela
Now we have come to the part where I am supposed to tell you that despite certain socio-economic-political-environmental-medicinal-sexual-penal problems, Maracuchos, and, by extension, Venezuelans, are really wonderful people—generous, outgoing, selfless, and they will open their hearts to you.

But I can’t say that. Just as you don’t make such sweeping generalizations about your own culture—“Oh, Americans are such generous people!”—I don’t make them about my adopted country folk. Of course, I am very attached to the people here (the real reason I keep coming back year after year) and I have a profound relationship with my host family who adopted me (and my ego), gave me 10 brothers and sisters, and have never stopped caring for me. However, Venezuela is a basket case of a country, a country whose every indices of health have been deteriorating since the late ‘70s; a country that even now, with the price of oil so high, is still sinking lower and lower. I have watched this steady decay for close to two decades now; I have watched this country—which once seemed so close to first-world prosperity—sink deeper and deeper into unremitting recession. On every visit, people say to me that it shouldn’t, it can’t, get any worse and every year it does. And that is why I am writing this… because, humor aside, I want you to see what I have seen: the tragedy of a society’s collapse.

Crime is perhaps the most important indicator of this social decay. In 1988 the scariest thing that happened to me was when the police picked me up, cleaned out my wallet, and drove me home. (To collect and serve.) Now Venezuela is one of the most dangerous places in the world, and I get guns waved in my face over the slightest things, like fighting over a parking space at the grocery. The country now has more kidnappings than Colombia and has had a 67 percent increase in homicides since 1999 (it wasn’t exactly Mayberry before).(8) In Caracas—the 9th level of crime purgatory—the inner city hospitals have become little more than war hospitals. One such hospital I visited received over 100 gunshot victims a week on average and seventy five percent of the broken bones were caused by bullets.(9) I know a lot of people in Venezuela, probably close to a thousand, and I don’t know a single family that hasn’t been the victim of a violent crime—whether it be kidnapping, carjackings, muggings, or rape. In 1997 my host-brother Marco escaped death only because a carjacker’s gun jammed when he tried to execute him. As cars with blood-soaked headrests flow West out of Maracaibo into Colombia, drugs flow in. Helped by Chávez’s assistance to Colombian guerilla groups, Venezuela has become the principal corridor for drugs leaving Colombia. (10)

To give you an indication of people’s desperation, one day Alvaro and I caught a teenager stealing the copper gas line that led into his neighbor’s house. We heard the hiss from the cut line and found the young man with the piping slung over his shoulder like a brown garden hose hopping over the neighbor’s wall. He then led us on a mile-long footrace (actually, just me, since Alvaro doesn’t believe in cardiovascular exercise and was begging for oxygen after the first block). I don’t think the kid had eaten in several days, which is probably why I eventually caught him. People in cars had seen the chase and a small mob formed around us—some wanted me to turn him over to the police, others wanted to beat him. It was an odd moment: privileged North American enforcing Venezuelan law. I knew that the copper piping was worth no more than six dollars at a scrap yard and I considered just letting him take it, yet despite my empathy for him (and probably more importantly, my understanding of the economic policies that drive Venezuela’s poverty) I couldn’t reward him for stealing. I took back the piping and let him go.
How is it that the world’s fifth largest oil exporter has come to this? How is it that 70 percent of its population lives in ranchos—the slums and shantytowns? How is it that the streets here are not paved with gold?

Who is to blame for all this? At the root of Venezuela’s woes is its class conflict, the gap between rich and poor. You have probably heard that in Latin America a small elite controls all the wealth. While this stereotype doesn’t exactly fit Venezuela, it is a good place for us to begin, as it is the very stereotype that fuels Chávez’s populism. (Venezuela escaped having the same intense caste system as most of Latin America because it was not important to the Spanish crown. There was nothing to exploit here…yet.)

Still, there is an elite class, the “oligarchs” as they are called, and they are a fascinating breed. There is no way to describe them that won’t sound like hyperbole, so you will just have to trust me. In short, all of the most outrageous stereotypes of the rich will be found among them. The yapping lap dogs; wives forged into Barbie dolls with plastic surgery; spoiled kids who attend bi- and trilingual schools, drive Land Cruisers, and converse in English and French at the mall while they look down their noses at the hoi-polloi. They are perceived (usually correctly) as infinitely shallow and materialistic. They are a leisure class: A group whose primary function is the consumption and display of wealth. (This is who Thorstein Veblen was talking about.) In a country that has so much poverty, it is hard to believe that such a class could exist, but there they are. They are out to advertise; for invidious display. Perhaps due to the oil culture, they behave like new money—they show it off—even when they are old money. Of course, this only aggravates class tensions because they are always sticking it in everyone else’s nose. “I have 7 series, nah-nah-na-na-nah.”

Although Maracaibo has its share, Caracas is where you find the greatest concentration of oligarchs, they live in the posh neighborhoods of Chula Vista, Altamira, and Country Club (not translated) behind ten-foot walls topped with razor wire guarded by men with sawed-off shotguns. From here the oligarchs sortie into the adjoining affluent shopping districts completely insulated from greater Venezuela. Most have never ridden the Metro, nor, heaven forbid, a bus. And that is the strongest feeling you get from the oligarchs: that they don’t see! That they live in some alternate, Bizarro universe where they are blind to the sprawling poverty that is all around and incapable of even considering that they might play a role in it. Sometimes, in my moments of frustration, I myself hope that mi comandante (Chávez) will round them all up and ship them to worker’s communes.

Of course, it is more complicated than that, and my description is a simplification. Many of the oligarchs are very active in social programs and have a profound patriotism for Venezuela. They are business people who fund schools in poor neighborhoods; doctors who go into the shantytowns and give free care; and attorneys who dedicate themselves to public service. Yet, what is important here is not the truth, but the stereotype—the widespread perception of the selfish oligarch who has gotten fat on Venezuela’s oil and neglected the poor. Oh, how easy it is to blame the country’s woes on them! They have made Chávez’s job so simple; they are the perfect scapegoat and have given him all the rope he needs to hang them with.

What’s more, the problem is not just the existence of the oligarchs, but the way that they influence the rest of the culture; the way the dwindling middle class and the lower class try to emulate them, idolize them. They are the goal: the Venezuelan Dream. Oh, to live in a penthouse in a gated community and shop in the nicest malls and vacation to Disney and have my nails done and get a new Xbox for junior and buy and buy and buy as only new (oil) money can buy.
How did this become Venezuela’s ideal? Let me give you a quick primer on Venezuelan politics and the answer should become clear.

How to Become the President of Venezuela
Now we won’t invite Jimmy Carter and, even though it is completely unprecedented, we will assume there is no corruption. Repeat the following: “I [insert your name] will turn Venezuela’s oil wealth into riches for all Venezuelans, including you [point finger]. I will SOW THE OIL so that you can fly to Miami to shop. The government of [insert existing president’s name] is corrupt. He [it’s always a “he”] is stealing the oil money for himself and his cronies.”

That’s it! Just say it over and over again and spend a little bit more money than your competitor and you’ll win. Decade after decade—for almost a century now—Venezuelans have fallen for this. (And why shouldn’t they? They are sitting atop the biggest fountain of wealth outside of the Middle-East.) Venezuelan culture is driven by this fantasy, by the hope that someday through hydrocarbon magic, and through little toil on their part, everyone will become as rich as Donald Trump and Paris Hilton. (By the way, Chávez and his bolivarianos are in no way immune to the dream. Perhaps the greatest irony is that the president and his quasi-socialist comrades are the nouveau riche, the new oligarchy [four legs good, two legs bad better].(11) Chávez’s mother, Elena, who raised her six boys in a shack with a dirt floor, now appears in papers with Coqui, her poodle, wearing designer clothes and a cumbersome amount of gold jewelry.(12) Oh, yes, now it is the former guerilla fighters who drive SUVs, get boob jobs, and look down their noses at the proletariat in the shantytowns.)

And what of those shantytowns? What of those helpless masses, who have been cheated by the oligarchs and corrupt politicians and must live in so much filth and squalor?

On your next visit to Venezuela stop and take a close look at the shantytowns. Remember this is where an estimated 70 percent of Venezuelans live. You will immediately notice some odd things. Many of these cheap brick homes are two and three stories high, painted and well taken care of. They are also well lit thanks to free (pirated) electricity—paid for by the legit customers. And what’s that? Yes, the rooftops are dotted with DirecTV dishes, about one every sixth house. (Unlike electricity, this cannot be stolen, although one dish can be shared with three of your neighbors.) (13) While there are few phone lines, most people have cell phones and if you walk through the shantytowns you will likely hear as many ring tones as you would on a college campus between classes. Like all Venezuelans, shantytown residents enjoy free education through college. Fifty-six percent of Venezuelans have a bachelor’s degree, which is more than twice the U.S. figure of 27 percent. And even before Chávez’s Cuban-led literacy programs, Venezuela had a 93 percent literacy rate, one of the best in Latin America. Venezuelans also get (albeit quite substandard) free healthcare. So what you have is perhaps the best educated, best connected, best electrified, moderately well medicated poor in the world with attorneys, engineers and nurses living among them.

Why do they live in this squalor? First, I hope I have shown that it is not always squalor. While there certainly is abject poverty in Venezuela and it is getting worse, the 70-80 percent poverty rate often cited in the media is deceptive because within the shantytowns there is a broad social stratification with business professionals on one end and the unemployed and destitute at the other. Second, like their oligarch counterparts, the poor believe in the fantasy of easy oil wealth; they believe—because the oil in the ground legally belongs to all Venezuelans—that they have the right to suckle from the teat of the state. Are they lazy? Yes, in a way, but mostly because the successive governments of Venezuela have created a system where the shantytowns are the best and logical choice for millions. In addition to the aforementioned social programs (that Chávez acts like he invented) the government has also subsidized building materials for the ranchos, encourages squatters, and subsidizes food staples—milk, rice, beans, sugar, meat—which makes it surprisingly easy to live, quite literally, on a couple of dollars a day.

Also, it is important to keep in mind that the shantytowns are not a new phenomena. The Venezuelan government has tried various initiatives over the last forty years to move shantytowners to proper housing, but with no luck. When offered subsidized housing, most Venezuelans will say thanks but no thanks. Living with no rent and no utilities is much better than being on the grid and paying more, even if it means more security. Hence, Venezuelans use their college-level reasoning skills to conclude that free is better than cheap. I know of one business owner in Zulia who already owned a house in town (on the grid), but then invaded some land with a group of squatters, built a new house there (off the grid) and now rents out his old house for extra money. So the “poor” remain in (or move into) the shantytowns and spend their money on DirecTV, cell phones, their pimped out Dodge Darts, and trips to the beach. They are waiting, biding their time until the next oil boom, when the state will have enough money to give them more. Oh, wait, we are in the midst of the biggest oil boom in history and still the country plunges down.

While we are talking about stereotypes, the most important stereotype of all is that Venezuela is a nation of adolescents. For boys, the stereotype holds that they are worshipped by their parents as incarnations of Jesus (the popular joke begins, how do you know that Jesus was Latino?). For girls the stereotype is that, because of the beauty queen culture, they are raised to be objects of idolatry and little else. As a result, neither sex ever truly grows up. In a way, I must admit that the stereotype has its kernel of truth but for a different reason: the bad parenting is not the fault of the biological parents, but rather the state, which has over many decades, given the poor (and continues to give them) just enough to keep them believing in the fantasy of easy wealth with little toil and—in the name of short-term political gain—has kept them from feeling any impetus to change and given them little opportunity to do so when they do.

Which leads us now to the hardest truth: that the fantasy of oil wealth, of the great oil-state that the politicians have foretold where everyone is fabulously rich, will never happen. That door has closed. Venezuela’s population is now too big and is growing too fast for this one commodity, as precious as it is, to support it. Without diversification of the economy, job creation, and a lot of hard work, Venezuela will continue to sink lower each year.

The real tragedy, however, is that the fantasy is too deep to exorcise. Venezuelans are still, to this day, so desperate to believe this Arthurian Legend, to believe that they will someday enjoy fabulous oil wealth, that they have finally surrendered their democracy in pursuit of the delusion, allowing Chávez to change and rechange the constitution, pack the Supreme Court and Election Council with his cronies, make laws by decree, place gag rules on the media, and otherwise systematically undermine Venezuela’s democratic institutions. All in the name of a fantasy that can never come true.

I admit that I had high hopes for Chávez at first. I’m a liberal democrat after all, and when he campaigned on the promise of revolutionizing Venezuela, I though, it’s about time. Unfortunately, Chávez is far worse than his predecessors and exponentially more corrupt because now graft is done in the name of the revolution—stealing land and oil company profits is done under the guise of redistributing wealth. Twenty-first century Robin Hoodism (emphasis on hood). All the money that Chávez injects into the streets—fish instead of fishing poles—cannot disguise the problems or build lasting change. While his government produces bogus statistics that laud his cultural transformation, the hard facts remain. Venezuela is a nation dependent on one very volatile commodity and the engine for reaping that harvest, the national oil company, is in trouble. In 2003 Chávez (illegally) fired half of the company’s employees—17,000 people—because they went on strike to oppose him. Concerned more with his political survival than long-term sustainability, Chávez has been churning and burning the company ever since to keep himself afloat. The result is that now, four years after the strike, ten thousand oil wells are shut down because of mismanagement, forcing Chávez to buy oil from Russia to meet contractual obligations.(14) What’s more, the country is still so burdened with debt, and the quality of Venezuelan oil so poor that oil has to remain above fifty dollars a barrel for there to be any net gain for the treasury. In short, the wide-held belief that Venezuela is once again awash in oil wealth is a myth. Economists warn that the Central Bank’s foreign reserves have already been spent—converted to local currency and earmarked for short-term spending.(15) Inflation is running at 18 percent and Chávez’s baffling price control system has run thousands of Venezuelan farmers out of business because they can’t make a profit: Supermarkets are full of imported liquor and cheese, but the only meat available is pork neck bones and rabbit.(16) Chávez’s recent move to nationalize other private companies like the phone company, CANTV, is not motivated by socialism, but by capitalism: he is running out of money.

As a student of Latin American history I have, for many years, excused this country’s fate as something beyond the control of most, if not all, Venezuelans; that the continuing social decay was the work of macroeconomic forces, oil prices, Structural Adjustment Programs, even meddling from the CIA and the State Department. Yet, the more I learn, the more I see that the history of Venezuela is not the history of its neighbors, not the history of coups and puppet governments, of flagrant economic imperialism and exploitation. There was no Pinochet here, no Batista, no Trujillo. The history of Venezuela is the history of Venezuelans cheating, defrauding, and robbing other Venezuelans and then trying to blame someone else for their crimes.

And so to conclude we return to Maracaibo, to Lake Maracaibo, to that 5,099 square miles of environmental disaster (about half the size Lake Erie), where oil contamination, careless dredging, and a Duck Weed infestation have killed most of its wildlife. In the ‘60s you could see dolphins playing in the lake, now it is not even safe for swimming and you take your life in your hands if you eat the fish. Chávez is quick to point his finger at the U.S. and Big Oil for the catastrophe, but the fact of the matter is that while there was certainly some pollution by the oil companies, it was not until after the industry was nationalized in 1975 and Big Oil was completely out of Venezuela that the preponderance of the damage was done. (It is also interesting to note that when the first oilmen arrived here in the 1910s, they commented on how polluted the lake was, before oil was even discovered.) Venezuelans, in the final analysis, have not taken care of their own house. Examples of this carelessness abound: Malaria was eradicated in this region in the 1930s by a massive humanitarian campaign led by, believe it or not, the company that is now Exxon Mobil; but now, because of lackadaisical prevention programs and mismanagement, malaria is back in pandemic proportions. As for Venezuela’s debt, while I understand the hardship a country faces when strapped with huge external debt, I experience compassion fatigue when I remind myself of the foolish way that Venezuela accumulated this debt, mostly in the early ‘70s, based on the asinine assumption that oil prices would stay at their all-time-high. So is the World Bank to blame? I know that their programs have proved disastrous in most of the developing world, but the only time Venezuela has experienced sustained economic growth since the ‘70s (that wasn’t just because of a spike in the price of oil) was during the early ‘90s under Carlos Andrés Pérez. While I am no fan of Pérez (he was impeached on corruption charges) the difficult economic package he implemented under World Bank guidelines showed more promise than any alternative before or since.

Sigh. Venezuela has some hard lessons to learn. In my darker moments, when I am frustrated, I want to throw up my hands and renounce my adopted citizenship. I tell myself that they are getting what they deserved; they have asked for this. But not the Maracuchos. To their credit, they were the first to see through Chávez’s ruse, to see that his is just a new twist on the same old corruption. They know the truth because, as they are quick to tell you, they are a cock-load smarter than everybody else.

Endnotes:

1. Dydynski, Krzysztof, Lonely Planet, Third edition, Melbourne, 2001. P. 233.

2. Venezuela and the Oil Pioneers, (Caracas: Lagoven S.A, 1993), 28.

3. “Biggest Oil Well Yet,” The New York Times, 18 March 1923, 13.

4.U.S. Department of Energy, International Energy Annual 2003, (Washington, DC: DOE, 2004) (4 March 2006). I have removed Canada from the list of producers (sometimes listed second) because most of its proven reserves are made up of oil sands.

5. Gonzalez, David, “Maracaibo Oil Region a Critical Battleground for Chávez as Venezuelan Conflict Rages,” The New York Times, March 4, 2003, P. A9

6. The 2000 Venezuelan census put the population at 24.2 million. I am rounding up to 25 million which is conservative estimate given that between 1990 and 2000 the population grew 34 pecent.

7.…two-thirds of all of it comes from Maracaibo. Dydynski, Krzysztof, Lonely Planet, Third edition, Melbourne, 2001. P. 233.

8. Romero, Simon “Chavez keeps lid on boom in murders,” Chicago Tribune, 3 December 2006.

9.Author’s interview, Dr. Ricardo Serbenescu, Caracas, 18 July 2003.

10. Robinson, Linda, “Terror Close to Home,” U.S. News and World Report, 6 October 2003, 20.

11. From George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Don’t ask me to slow the bus down again.

12.Romero, Simon, “Expanding Power Puts Family of Venezuelan President Under Increasing Scrutiny,” The New York Times, 18 February, 2007.

13. Author’s interview, Alfonso Rubio, Atlanta, GA, 18 January 2007.

14. Duarte, Joe, “Venezuela Buys Oil to Meet Contracts,” Rig Zone. 02 May 2006. > Accessed on 6 December 2006.

15.Lakshmanan, Indira A.R. “Critics slam Venezuelan oil windfall spending.” The Boston Globe. 13 August 2006.

16. Romero, Simon. “Chávez Threatens to Jail Violators of Price Controls.” The New York Times. 17 February 2007.

5.14.2009

350




Article 350 of the Venezuelan Bolivarian Constitution:

The people of Venezuela, true to their republican tradition and their struggle for independence, peace and freedom, shall disown any regime, legislation or authority that violates democratic values, principles and guarantees or encroaches upon human rights.

5.11.2009

Chavez announces that Globovision will be taken off the airwaves...



Yesterday, in his personal efforts to also control the media, Hugo Chavez Frias, Venezuela´s current President announced that he will close Globovision or his name will no longer be Hugo Chavez Frias.

Emulating a very intellectually poor barrio thug, Chavez made a personal threat to close Globovision (or take them off the Venezuelan public airwaves) or he will change his name. So lets wait and watch the press closely to see whether or not, Chavez will close them or to see if he changes his name to something like CheGuevara, Fidel or Camilo Cienfuegos...

Lets remember Chavez´s war against private media en Venezuela. Even though that Chavez was democratically elected back in 1999 by strong collaboration of the status quo media outlets at that time, after more than a decade of governing Venezuela, he has waged a personal battle against the private media.

Back in 2006 Chavez ordered the closure of the first Television station in Venezuela, Radio Caracas Television, on account that they had collaborated with the coup de etat in April/2002 against his government. On account that the Television Station did not politically support his government, Chavez did not grant the extension of the television concession to Radio Caracas Television (RCTV) and orderred the transfer of all their assets to a socially motived television station called, TVES. No compensation was paid by the government in a clear ilegitimate confiscatory measure. Chavez´s argument for this government intervention was the lack of government news in television, which was clearly not the case, since the government had at that specific more more than 10 television stations, 4 of them transmitting nationally and more than 100 community radio stations.

Not only that but on account of the political violence of Chavez against Globovision and their reporters, some reporters filed a lawsuit before the Interamerican Court of Human Rights of the Organization of American States (OAS), which after strong litigation, ordered the state of Venezuela to stop the violation of free press against Globovision and their reporters. What is Globovision´s mistake? What are Globovision´s reporters doing wrong? They just disagree with Chavez and its government.

What I find really sad and pathetic is that because of Chavez direct intervention, several private media outlets (Venevision, Panorama, Televen) have had no choice but divert their editorial to favour or support Chavez and his socialist ideologies. This is also called censorship...

Now, why do you think Chavez wants to censor the media?

5.08.2009

Chavez expropriates Oil Contractors in Lake Maracaibo





In his personal efforts to control Venezuela´s economy, the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, has enacted a new law to expropriate the provision of goods and services related to the Oil Industry. The law is termed, Organic Law that Reserves to the State Goods and Services related to the primary activity of the Oil Industry.

The law was quickly prepared by the National Assembly and last night was enacted by Hugo Chavez himself. What is really important about the law is that all activities involving goods and services related to the Oil Industry will now be owned by the State in what Chavez calls "social property" or in spanish "propiedad social". The law provides that the expropriated shareholders will be paid book value for their shares and permits the avenue of public bonds.

And what is social property, is it the same treatment as public goods destined for public utility, like say public parks, benches and plazas, or is Chavez reffering to public goods destined for private utility, such as the huge network of private companies owned by the State, such as PDVSA (Oil), Pequiven (Petrochemicals), CVG (Steel, Aluminum), the Venezuela Cement Corporation? Chavez has a very confused and troubled head...

Chavez wants to totally control Venezuela´s economy and his advisers have come up now with the idea that all the Oil contractors in Venezuela should be expropriated and its assets and employees transferred to state owned PDVSA. Lets consider that the Oil contractors in Venezuela and even more in the State of Zulia significantly contribute to the local economy. What we are seeing is just a revenge against privately own contractors, most of them owned by European families with highly technical and ethical corporate histories, to wipe them out of the oil economic scene.

I personally think that Hugo Chavez has a personal and hidden agenda against the State of Zulia and the city of Maracaibo.

5.07.2009

Murdoch bites back / Internet in market failure



The net is in market failure. Could you believe that?

The efforts of the status-quo in Wall Street are trying to turn the internet into a (more efficient) cash machine. They have plans to eliminate or signficantly reduce free online content in a move that will definitely change internet. Or at least thats what they will try to do...

Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch expects News Corporation-owned newspaper Web sites to start charging users for access within a year in a move he says could radically shake-up the culture of freely available content.

Murdoch said the existing Internet business model was "malfunctioning."

Speaking on a conference call as News Corporation announced a 47 percent slide in quarterly profits to $755 million, Murdoch said the current free access business model favored by most content providers was flawed.

"We are now in the midst of an epochal debate over the value of content and it is clear to many newspapers that the current model is malfunctioning," the News Corp. Chairman and CEO said.

"We have been at the forefront of that debate and you can confidently presume that we are leading the way in finding a model that maximises revenues in return for our shareholders... The current days of the Internet will soon be over."

Murdoch said the experience of the News Corp.-owned Wall Street Journal had proved that charging for content could be made to work. Would you pay to use news Web sites? Sound Off below

He said 360,000 people had downloaded an iPhone WSJ application in three weeks and said users would soon be made to pay "handsomely" for accessing WSJ content.

Murdoch said he envisaged News Corporation titles introducing charges within 12 months.

Now the real issue will be if Rupert Murdoch will go after Google and Youtube and charge them for the free online content. This will obviously create a hurricane of legal fees in major IP law firms in London and New York. Covington & Burling, White and Case and the likes...

5.06.2009

Venezuelan anomie


Anomie, is a sociological term that signifies in individuals an erosion, diminution, or absence of personal norms, standards, or values, and increased states of psychological normlessness. It also translates into a social condition in which norms are weak, conflicting, or absent. When applied to a government or society, anomie implies a social unrest.

Émile Durkheim described anomie as a state of relative normlessness or a state in which norms have been eroded. A norm is an expectation of how people will behave, and it takes the form of a rule that is socially rather than formally enforced. Thus, in structural functionalist theory, whether at a personal or societal level, the effect of normlessness is to introduce alienation, isolation, and desocialisation as norms become less binding for individuals.

In my opinion, what we are living in Venezuela is a sense of chronic anomie. With the high levels of crimes commited, it also makes no sense to report them to the police. Yesterday, Tuesday May 5, 2009 my brother got mugged at gun point at around 7pm while going in a pizza joint in front of a major hospital in Maracaibo. The burglar took his cellphone and his wallet.

It is true here in Venezuela theres always a sense of normlessness, everything from the guy that watches your car and demands his tip to the bank officer who expects his bottle of whisky if he approves your credit. The worst part is that we Venezuelans often take advantage of the chaos around us, or anomie, and often use to our own convenience.

While I remain in agreement with Ralph Dahrendorf that a legal system that prosecutes all the crimes renders it ineffective, at the same time, a system where no or little crimes are prosecuted gives a sense of unrest, where people tend to take the law into their own hands, into a violating-the-law-down-whirl-spiral, wheres theres nothing in the end. There are loads of examples in Venezuela, from local lynch mobs killing local barrio thugs to blunt fragrant violation of exchange laws by thousands of people selling their Cadivi rights to obtain foreing currency, buying pirate hollywood dvds or software in the street in broad daylight or just paying to get your legally free passport.

The sense of law is absent in Venezuela...

5.04.2009

Social-who?



Social-me, social-forever, social-comics....what is socialism?

Edmund Burke on (the Venezuelan) Revolution




Do not be fooled, it is virtually impossible that Edmund Burke wrote something about Venezuela, let alone about the Chavista so-called socialist Revolution...

Edmund Burke was a famous Irish born political thinker back in the 18th century and served for many years in the British House of Commons as a member of the Whig party. He is mainly remembered for his opposition to the French Revolution.

In 1789, soon after the Fall of the Bastille, the French aristocrat Charles-Jean-François Depont asked his impressions of the Revolution; Burke replied with two letters. The longer, second letter became Reflections on the Revolution in France, published in 1790.

As per his Reflections, Burke argued that the French Revolution would end disastrously, because its abstract foundations, purportedly rational, ignored the huge complexities of human nature and society. Further, he focused on the practicality of solutions instead of the metaphysics, writing:

'What is the use of discussing a man's abstract right to food or to medicine? The question is upon the method of procuring and administering them. In this deliberation I shall always advise to call in the aid of the farmer and the physician, rather than the professor."

Founded upon St. Augustine, Cicero, and Plato, he believed in "human heart"-based government. Nevertheless, he was contemptuous and afraid of the Enlightenment, led by intellectuals such as Rousseau, Voltaire, and Turgot, who disbelieved in Divine Moral Order and Original Sin, saying that society should be handled like a living organism, that people and society are limitlessly complicated, thus, leading him to conflict with Thomas Hobbes's assertion that politics might be reducible to a deductive system akin to mathematics.

Burke has been termed as a cornerstone of the conservative intellectual in Britain, eventhough that he was a member of the Whig party which in turn became the Liberals. So it is also natural to see classic liberal thinkers supporting Burkes view on government and society.